Orbital Defense in Flatland book

June 17, 2019

It has been stated that the orbitals out of Schrodinger’s Equation do not match possible Solar Systems.  In 1-D, 2-D, and 3-D I believe they can and have tried to represent them in my book.  Let me take the hardest one:

This is 4p in 3-D. Since I only hinted at the explanation in my book I am posting it here.  This is like the center is a big Sun.  Then there is a pretty big Sun revolving around it.  Then there are planets revolving around that pretty big Sun.   They are perpendicular to not get dragged into the big Sun.  If the pretty big Sun is closer those planets tend to be further away because otherwise they would fall into the big Sun. If the pretty big Sun is further away, planets don’t have this problem and tend to be closer.  That is because closer orbits are more likely.  Then the part on the other side of the big Sun goes in and out with gravity on them; it is a counter-balance.  The orbital is tipped in slightly at the front edge; at that length the planets can be not as perpendicular.  Also they needn’t revolve; velocity and acceleration can hold the two Suns in place.